Jewellery Quarter treasure of the industrial Heritage

photo: Nonna Gudieva, Yana Butcher

In addition, I was able to talk with the museum historian, Rupert Fisher, a man who knows everything about the museum and the jewellery Quarter of Birmingham.

Several years ago, while traveling in South America, in Rio de Janeiro, I visited the jewellery factory Hstern, Oscar Niemeyer used to work with this jewellery factory. It was the moment when my great love for jewellery design began, which has much in common with architecture.

There is a poetic definition of architecture by Joseph Brodsky:

"You are, in essence, something that nature failed to create"

These words can be turned to jewellery as well, as if the initial material of the jeweler-precious stones were not enchanting, they become metal with the work of jewellery art only when the harmony of the line and forms, created by the creative genius of man, joins the qualities of the material.

And this is the reason why jewellery brands are collaborating to work on the design of their products with some great architects-Tiffany & Co collaborates with Frank Gehry, Zaha Hadid, Ross Lovegrove. Ron Arad worked with Swarovski, the jewelry brand Louis Golay entrusted the creation of the collection to Karim Rashid and of course the work of Oscar Niemeyer Hstern.

Architects and designers create the future and modern jewellery - this is a high architecture in small form, functional sculptures, with a history, name and a big futuristic charge, the design today became the bearer of surplus value.

The Museum of the Jewellery Quoter in Birmingham and the Jewellery Quarter itself are among the three most visited attractions in the world. It is possible not only to learn the history of the origin of jewellery design, but also to see how the jewellery industry lives today.

photo: Rupert Fischer

The first piece of jewellery appeared in ancient times, long before the new era. It is difficult to establish now which need a human had earlier and stronger - the need for clothing or the desire to decorate himself.

And what was the impetus for the development of a jewellery trade in Birmingham?

The impetus for establishing a precious metalworking trade in Birmingham was, most probably, to meet the needs of the aristocracy and nobility. Jewellery was similar to clothing when it came to portraying rank and wealth.  At the beginning of the Medieval era, when precious metalworkers started to appear in small numbers in Birmingham, the only people wealthy enough to afford jewels and fine metals were the nobility.  However, with the expansion of trade and commerce, and therefore a more developed and larger middle class, more people could afford jewellery.  By the fourteenth century, the wearing of it became so common that, like with clothing, sumptuary laws were passed restricting the amount of people allowed to wear jewellery, based on amount of land owned and social ranking. 

Birmingham is very well known for having a ‘jewellery quarter’, and for having in it one of the leading Assay Offices in the country. It was an industrial city, where a large variety of crafts flourished, but why exactly did the jewellery business get such a major development? How did, first the jewellery quarter and then the assay office appear and what also is the history of the Museum of the Jewellery Quarter’s creation?

During the 18^th century, Birmingham and Sheffield were the fastest growing provincial towns in England. The population of Britain as a whole had doubled during that time but Birmingham had done a whole lot more than double, it had duo decupled. In 1700 its population was 5-7 thousand but with a growth rate significantly above that of the period its ranks had swelled, by 1801, to over 73,000 (73,670).

It was reported that, “The skills and ingenuity of the Birmingham (metalworking) Masters and Artisans, the ready availability of iron ore and coal from South Staffs and North Worcs, and the high consumer demand for Toys and metal products in general were the main reasons for the town’s phenomenal growth at this time”.

But what does any of this have to do with jewellery? Well, in those days the word ‘toy’ referred to a whole array of small fashionable personal accessories such as buttons, shoe buckles, snuff boxes, vinaigrettes, chatelaines and jewellery, and also to useful household objects such as sugar tongs, candle snuffers, corkscrews and tea chests.

A rapidly spreading fashion for such items arose upon the return to England of King Charles the 2^nd who had been exiled in France following the English Civil War.

Whilst in France he had taken up the wearing of elaborate buttons and buckles, considered the height of sophisticated fashion. Returning from exile in 1660 with French buckles and jewellery he was known to have remarked that Birmingham manufacturers were ‘equal to copying’ such items.

Ever adaptable and ready to cater for a new demand, Birmingham’s metal workers began turning out thousands of buttons and buckles, first in steel then in silver and gold, some embellished with enamels, coloured glass and gemstones. The manufacture of toys laid the foundation for precious metalworking as a major industry in the town.

So well established did Birmingham become as a centre for such production that by the second half of the 18^th century it earned for itself such nicknames as, ‘The Toyshop of Europe’, ‘The Workshop of the World’, with one commentator describing it as the first manufacturing town in the world and contemporary reports of the period announcing that; - ‘No other town in Europe can equal it. So prevalent is the spirit of industry, so early learned their children and practiced in riper years, that you won’t see an idle person lurking around the streets’, another report announcing that ‘such items bought in Milan can be got (sic) better and cheaper in Birmingham’! Birmingham’s production of buttons alone during this period established its reputation internationally as the world’s leading button making centre.

Jewellery manufacture had generally been carried on as specialist branch of the toy trade but became established as an industry in its own right when toy makers switched to its production upon the decline of the buckle and gilt button trade. Birmingham jewellers of the 19^th century had family business’s that had been started by toy making grandfathers in the 18^th century.

One of the leading toy makers and silversmiths in Birmingham in the mid-18^th century was Matthew Boulton. He had inherited his father’s button and buckle making business in 1759 but the small workshop cramped his style and ambition. In the early 1760’s he built his new Soho Manufactory, one of the world’s first fully integrated factories run on the assembly line principal and the largest of its kind anywhere in the world at the time. Here he extended the family’s range of buckles, buttons and jewellery and, amongst other things, added larger items of tableware in silver and Sheffield Plate, created exceptionally fine ornaments in Ormolu, minted coins on the world’s first steam-powered minting press of his own design and of course partnered the inventive James Watt in the production of steam engines.

By 1770 Boulton and other Birmingham manufacturers were increasingly producing larger items of silver tableware, but in developing this trade they were seriously hampered by having to take their goods to Chester or London to be assayed and hallmarked. Boulton led a campaign for Birmingham to have its own assay office, and, despite fierce opposition from London silversmiths, succeeded in 1773 when Birmingham’s first office for testing and hallmarking precious metal items opened in several rented rooms above the Kings Head public house on New Street in the town centre.  

It is now one of the busiest of the four remaining assay offices in the Britain and would routinely test and hallmark 49,000 articles per day which equates to roughly 12 million per year. The Jewellery Quarter in Birmingham has been the main centre of precious metalworking in Britain for over the last 150 years as figures such as these allude to.

The Museum of the Jewellery Quarter itself was established after the jewellery manufacturing firm of Smith & Pepper ceased trading in 1981. It had been the wish of the two elderly brothers and one sister who ran the firm that it be preserved and the intact and complete offices and workshops of this medium sized jewellery firm form the ‘time capsule’ core that the museum is built around. Founded by Charles Smith and his Uncle Edwin Pepper in 1899 the firm produced cufflinks, lockets, crosses, pendants, brooches and earrings in gold and silver and were particularly well known for their snake jewellery and bamboo bracelets.

The museum also has permanent galleries that explain the history and development of the jewellery quarter, has a floor dedicated to jewellery made from all of the traditionally used natural substances, plus a changing exhibition gallery, tearoom and shop showcasing a wide selection of the work of local designer jewellers.

Who were the jewellers of Birmingham who formed and created a jewellery fashion, were they great artists or great craftsmen? What is primary in this business, the genius of the artist or technology and skill? The census of 1553 called one of the first jewellers of Birmingham, Roger Pemberton-who was this man?

The earliest mediaeval records of precious metalworkers in Birmingham are scarce and scattered. In 1343 three silversmiths are mentioned, then in 1460 John Blackwyn is recorded as being a Birmingham goldsmith. The names of these individuals come to us today, not because Birmingham was keeping a record of its esteemed citizens, but instead rather by chance, as these craftsmen were all in trouble with the law and their names are held in records of the judicial system of the period. Craft guilds, which governed the crafts of gold and silversmithing in towns and cities throughout Europe were absent in Birmingham. On the one hand was advantageous as many people who wished to practice their craft, unfettered by strict craft guild rules came and settled here, but for us this has the disadvantage that the large body of information a craft guild would retain about its members and their work is also absent.

With the advent large-scale toy then jewellery making, another fact which obscures our view of individual Birmingham crafts-people and their work comes from how these trades were traditionally structured. Both the toy and jewellery trades were largely trades of many small-sized specialist firms who worked to the order of the merchant. There were large firms who had their own designers, crafts people, and marketing mechanisms; it is recorded, for example that these firms would employ renowned designers from continental Europe, but when it came to the myriad, ‘Small Masters’, specialising in one aspect of the whole process of manufacture, the work of this mass of highly skilled individuals would go largely uncelebrated in the world at large.

It is the names of Matthew Boulton, Sir Edward Thomason, Thomas Bragg (of the firm T&J Bragg), then Arts & Crafts workers such as Bernard Cuzner, W.T. Blackband and Georgie and Arthur Gaskin, (amongst very many others), who can, and should be held aloft as representatives of the best that Birmingham had to offer.

Birmingham, was a world-famous city, a pioneer of major technological achievements since the mid-1700s-and with every new mastered technique, the pictorial language of its masters received more and more means of artistic expression. How did the achievements of scientific and technological progress affect the jewellery business? How much has the quality of products and the design of jewellery changed with the advent of new technologies? Is it possible to see in the museum the technological process of creating ornaments, what did the raw materials look like, the metals from which they were made, how and when did the first use of alloys begins?

The jewellery trade, still to this day relies on handcrafting tools and techniques that would be instantly recognisable in jewellery workshops of Mediaeval Europe, the Roman Empire and in some cases that of the Egyptians. Although jewellery making in Birmingham had been gradually emerging along-side- and to some extent, out of-the declining buckle and toy trades from the mid-18^th century, it was not until around the accession of Queen Victoria that it became a trade of major importance. Yet if jewellery was the newest and arguably the most consistently prosperous of Birmingham’s four main trades of the period (Brass, guns, jewellery, buttons), it was also the one that proved most resistant to technological change, and in a sense the most obdurately traditional. By the 1860s, such things as gold ear-rings could be made by means of ‘dies and machinery’. ‘Steam power and elaborate machinery’ were also employed ‘to a small extent’ in the making of gold, silver, and gilt chains. Even more significantly, at the bottom end of the market there were manufacturers who used ‘the press and the stamp’ to turn out ‘imitations of the more elaborate and delicately finished jewellery’ so that ‘a locket, which in gold might be worth from 15 to 30 shillings, is produced in metal gilt for a penny. Nevertheless, even the cheap stamped and pressed wares had to be assembled and finished by skilled manual workers. And ‘the class of best work’, which included such things as gold and silver necklaces, brooches, rings and bracelets, often set with precious stones, depended entirely on highly skilled craftsmen. This situation led contemporary commentators to state that. ‘In Hockley, which is the Clerkenwell of Birmingham (Clerkenwell is the seat of the London jewellery trade), they turn out some of the most beautiful jewellery in the world ‘for a few pence’, although perhaps a street away you will find a diamond tiara growing in the gem setter’s hands fit to grace the brows of an Empress.

One 19^th century industrial development that had a major impact on the worlds of jewellery and silversmithing was electroplating. The Birmingham jewellery quarter firm of Elkington’s were the first to patent and make a commercial success of this new means of applying sufficient levels of precious metal to base metals. They developed the idea of a Birmingham doctor that when silver salts of cyanide were electrified they would bond with the surface of the positively charged article. Elkington’s were able to make the most elaborate and ornate pieces of work which could then be easily coated making very many articles for the newly emerging middle-classes at a cheaper rate than its sterling silver counterpart. The Venus Rosewater dish held aloft at the winner’s ceremony of Wimbledon tennis tournament is one of their most easily recognisable pieces.

Many pieces of jewellery were likewise made by this more affordable method.

The mass production technologies increasingly entering the trade such as stamps, presses and lathes did not signal the demise of the